ACT is calling for changes to school uniform rules in a bid to make them more affordable for New Zealand families, arguing that the current system places unnecessary financial pressure on parents and caregivers.
“Many families are spending well over $1,000 per child on school uniforms once they buy multiple shirts, socks, skirts, shorts, PE gear, and replacement items throughout the year,” says ACT Education spokesperson Laura McClure.
ACT argues that these expenses can become a barrier to education, particularly as children quickly outgrow clothing and require replacements throughout their schooling years.
The party is proposing a shift toward simpler and more flexible uniform requirements. This includes reducing the number of compulsory branded items, allowing more generic clothing options, and increasing competition among uniform suppliers. ACT also supports expanding second-hand uniform markets, which are already widely used in many schools.
Concerns about the affordability of school uniforms have been widely discussed in New Zealand in recent years, with parents, educators and advocacy groups regularly raising the issue as part of broader cost-of-living pressures.
School uniforms vary significantly in cost depending on the school and the number of required branded items. Some families are able to reuse or purchase second-hand items, while others face higher costs where uniforms are more prescriptive or must be purchased from approved suppliers.
Consumer advocacy groups have previously noted that branded school items can be more expensive than generic alternatives, due in part to specialised production, embroidery, and supplier arrangements. In some cases, schools require purchases through approved vendors, which can limit choice and competition.
There is also a strong second-hand uniform market in many communities, with schools and parent groups operating resale shops, donation schemes, and exchange programmes to help reduce costs for families.
Some schools have introduced more flexible approaches, such as allowing generic clothing in certain uniform categories or accepting a mix of branded and non-branded items. These approaches are often cited as ways to reduce costs while maintaining a consistent school identity.
However, school communities and education stakeholders also note that uniforms can play a role in promoting equity and a sense of belonging by reducing visible socioeconomic differences between students. School boards generally retain responsibility for setting uniform policies, balancing affordability with school identity and practicality.
The debate continues to sit at the intersection of equity, school autonomy, and rising household costs, particularly as families weigh education expenses against broader financial pressures.
